The “Good News” Behind Rising UK Unemployment — Why Higher Jobless Figures Don’t Tell the Whole Story
Key Takeaways:
- Rising unemployment does not always mean job losses — A significant part of the increase reflects more people re-entering the labour market and actively seeking work, rather than widespread redundancies.
- Higher labour participation can benefit businesses — An expanding workforce can ease recruitment pressures, moderate wage inflation, and support more sustainable economic growth.
- Context matters for risk and policy decisions — Employers, lenders, and policymakers should look beyond headline figures, as participation-driven unemployment may overstate economic and credit risk.
At first glance, the latest UK unemployment figures look troubling. The Office for National Statistics reports that the unemployment rate rose to 5.1% in the three months to October 2025 — the highest level in more than four years and a sharp increase from 4.4% at the end of 2024. In a period already defined by higher payroll taxes, rising operating costs, and cautious hiring, it is easy to read this as confirmation that the labour market is weakening.
But as recent analysis has highlighted, the headline unemployment rate masks a more complex — and in some respects more encouraging — reality. When examined closely, the rise in unemployment is not being driven solely, or even primarily, by mass job losses. Instead, it reflects a significant shift in who is participating in the labour market at all.
From an employment law, regulatory, and business-risk perspective, this distinction matters.
Why unemployment figures can mislead
Unemployment statistics only count people who are actively looking for work. They exclude the “economically inactive” — individuals who are not employed and not seeking work due to illness, education, childcare responsibilities, early retirement, or other reasons.
When those economically inactive individuals re-enter the job market and begin looking for work, they immediately appear in unemployment figures — even if no one has lost a job. As a result, unemployment can rise at the same time as labour market engagement improves.
This appears to be exactly what is happening in the UK.
According to ONS data, the economically active population increased by approximately 643,000 during the first nine months of 2025. Over the same period, the number of unemployed people rose by around 280,000. In other words, a substantial portion of the increase in unemployment reflects more people choosing — or being forced — to look for work, not fewer jobs overall.
For employers, policymakers, and advisers, that distinction changes how risk should be assessed.
Labour supply returning — not just jobs disappearing
The return of workers to the labour market can have several drivers, not all of them positive. Some individuals may be returning because household finances are under strain, forcing early retirees or secondary earners back into work. Others may be responding to improved childcare provision, flexible working options, or better health outcomes after long-term illness.
From a legal and regulatory standpoint, these differences matter less than the overall trend: labour supply is increasing.
For businesses, a broader labour pool can ease recruitment bottlenecks, reduce wage pressure in overheated sectors, and support more sustainable growth. This is particularly relevant after several years in which employers struggled to hire due to post-pandemic inactivity and skills shortages.
In practical terms, more active jobseekers can also mean fewer unfilled vacancies and less reliance on short-term contractors, agency staff, or overseas recruitment — all of which carry higher compliance and cost risks.
What this means for employers’ risk exposure
Rising unemployment figures typically trigger concern about litigation risk, redundancy exposure, and employee relations. However, where unemployment increases are driven by labour market re-entry rather than job destruction, those risks may be overstated.
For example:
- Redundancy risk remains more closely tied to job losses than to unemployment rates.
- Wrongful and unfair dismissal claims tend to increase when employers are actively cutting headcount, not when labour supply expands.
- Collective consultation obligations are triggered by dismissals, not by labour market participation rates.
This distinction is particularly important for sectors such as financial services, professional services, and retail — industries that closely track employment data when assessing provisioning, compliance exposure, and workforce planning.
Banking, credit risk, and the participation effect
The difference between job losses and labour market re-entry is especially relevant for lenders.
Banks traditionally model credit risk on unemployment levels, assuming that rising unemployment leads directly to higher default rates. Lloyds Banking Group, for example, has historically mapped a 1 percentage point increase in unemployment to a £133 million rise in credit losses.
But if unemployment rises because more people are looking for work — rather than because people are losing jobs — the risk profile changes. New jobseekers may be unemployed temporarily, between periods of inactivity and employment, without the income shock that typically drives loan defaults.
For banks and lenders, this means headline unemployment figures may overstate credit risk if participation-driven unemployment is not properly accounted for.
From a regulatory compliance perspective, this also raises questions about stress testing assumptions, capital adequacy modelling, and consumer duty obligations when assessing borrowers’ financial resilience.
Employment law implications: a changing workforce profile
An expanding labour force also reshapes the legal landscape for employers.
More jobseekers often means:
- Greater age diversity, as older workers return to employment;
- More flexible working requests, particularly from parents and carers re-entering the workforce;
- Increased health-related disclosures, including long-term conditions or disabilities that previously kept individuals economically inactive.
This places renewed emphasis on employers’ obligations under equality and discrimination law, particularly around reasonable adjustments, indirect discrimination, and fair recruitment practices.
A rising labour supply does not remove legal risk — it shifts it. Employers must ensure that recruitment processes, job criteria, and workplace policies are adapted to a more diverse and potentially vulnerable applicant pool.
Caution still required: not all signals are positive
None of this is to suggest that the UK labour market is booming. Rising costs, subdued growth, and reduced vacancies are real pressures, and some job losses are undoubtedly occurring.
Moreover, the ONS itself has acknowledged ongoing issues with labour market data quality, meaning figures should be interpreted with care. Businesses should be wary of drawing firm conclusions from any single data release.
However, the underlying trend — more people engaging with the labour market — provides a degree of resilience that pure “job cuts” narratives miss.
A more balanced view of labour market health
For employers and advisers, the key lesson is this: rising unemployment does not automatically signal economic deterioration. Context matters.
An economy where people are willing and able to look for work is fundamentally different from one in which workers are being shed en masse. From a legal, financial, and operational standpoint, increased participation can support stability, reduce structural shortages, and ease some of the distortions created by post-pandemic inactivity.
The UK economy may not be firing on all cylinders, but neither is it stalling in the way headline unemployment figures alone might suggest. For businesses navigating 2026, understanding that nuance will be critical — not just for workforce planning, but for managing legal risk, regulatory exposure, and long-term strategy.
At Parachute Law, we continue to advise clients to look beyond the headline numbers. In today’s labour market, the story behind the statistics often matters more than the statistics themselves.
Related Articles:
Rising Costs and the Employment Rights Bill: Why UK Businesses Fear for Jobs and Growth
