Thousands of NHS staff to be made redundant after £1bn funding deal

Major restructuring to cut NHS bureaucracy

The government has confirmed that thousands of NHS jobs will be cut after the Treasury approved the £1 billion funding needed to pay for redundancies, marking one of the largest administrative shake-ups in the health service’s history.

The move will affect around 18,000 staff across NHS England, local health boards, and the Department of Health and Social Care, primarily targeting managers and non-clinical administrators.

Ministers say the plan is essential to “remove unnecessary bureaucracy,” with the aim of saving £1 billion a year by the end of the parliament — money they say will be redirected to frontline operations, technology upgrades, and staff retention.

How the redundancy funding works

The Treasury has not provided new cash for the redundancies. Instead, the NHS has been given permission to overspend its existing budget this year to meet the one-off costs of severance packages.

Officials said the service would “recoup” the cost in later years through lower staffing expenditure and improved efficiency.

The arrangement was finalised after months of discussions between the Treasury, Department of Health, and NHS England, following concerns about how the redundancy bill would be paid without affecting frontline services.

‘Every penny will be spent wisely’

Health Secretary Wes Streeting is expected to confirm the job cuts in a speech to NHS leaders at the annual NHS Providers conference in Manchester, where he will insist that the reorganisation is about value — not austerity.

“I want to reassure taxpayers that every penny they are being asked to pay will be spent wisely,” Streeting is due to say.
 “Our investment to offer more services at evenings and weekends, arm staff with modern technology, and improve staff retention is working.
 At the same time, cuts to wasteful spending on things like recruitment agencies saw productivity grow by 2.4% in the most recent figures — we are getting better bang for our buck.”

Streeting’s remarks come just weeks before Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivers her Budget on 26 November, expected to outline further reforms to NHS funding and performance targets.

Integrated Care Boards to be halved

The job losses will also hit the Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) — regional bodies responsible for planning local health services.

Under new instructions, ICBs will be required to cut their headcounts by 50%, as part of the government’s plan to turn the NHS into a more “neighbourhood-based” service focused on community health.

The long-term vision, set out in the government’s NHS reform plan, includes abolishing NHS England as a standalone organisation and reintegrating it into the Department of Health within two years.

Political backdrop: Budget tensions and party unrest

The timing of the announcement is politically charged. The Labour government, facing falling poll numbers ahead of a difficult budget, has been under pressure to prove it can balance fiscal restraint with investment in public services.

Rumours of a possible leadership challenge against Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have circulated in Westminster, with speculation that Wes Streeting himself could emerge as a contender. His spokesperson dismissed the reports, insisting the minister is “fully focused on the health service.”

Streeting’s high-profile speech in Manchester — hours after the Treasury approval was confirmed — is being seen as a chance to reassert control of the narrative: that streamlining the NHS is about freeing up funds for better patient outcomes, not cutting corners.

Financial and operational impact

The £1 billion redundancy bill represents a significant short-term cost for the NHS, but the government argues that annual savings from reduced management costs will offset the expense within the next few years.

The plan aims to channel savings into:

• Hiring clinical staff and reducing agency spending;
   
• Improving digital infrastructure and automation;
   
• Expanding evening and weekend operations to cut waiting lists.
   

However, critics warn that large-scale redundancies could destabilise NHS operations in the short term, particularly if experienced administrators and planners are lost.

The NHS Confederation and Royal College of Nursing (RCN) have previously cautioned against “cutting coordination capacity,” arguing that efficient administration is essential for delivering high-quality care.

Legal and employment considerations (for Parachute Law readers)

From an employment-law perspective, the NHS restructuring raises several key issues:

1. Collective redundancy consultation
    
   • Under UK law, employers proposing to dismiss 20 or more employees within 90 days at a single establishment must consult staff and unions for at least 30 to 45 days, depending on the numbers affected.
      
   • Given the scale of the NHS programme, collective consultation obligations will apply nationally and locally.
      
2. Redundancy pay and public-sector rules
    
   • Redundancy entitlements are governed by a mix of statutory and contractual provisions under the Agenda for Change pay framework.
      
   • Severance terms may be capped to meet Treasury limits, raising the potential for disputes over calculation methods or eligibility.
      
3. TUPE and organisational transfer
    
   • The reintegration of NHS England into the Department of Health could trigger TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings) implications, transferring contracts and liabilities to the new structure.
      
4. Judicial review and consultation transparency
    
   • Unions may seek judicial review if consultation or equality-impact assessments are deemed inadequate.
      
   • The Public Sector Equality Duty requires authorities to consider the disproportionate impact of redundancies on certain groups, such as women, ethnic minorities, and disabled staff.
      

Reform vs. reality

The government’s plan to slim down NHS management follows repeated promises to “cut waste, not care.” Yet analysts note that management costs make up less than 3% of total NHS spending, meaning deep savings will depend on genuine efficiency improvements rather than headcount cuts alone.

Public trust will hinge on whether the reforms deliver visible benefits — shorter waiting times, better access to GPs, and modernised digital systems — without eroding service coordination.

As one senior health economist put it:

“You can’t operate a world-class health service without people to run it. The danger is that in cutting bureaucracy, you also cut brains.”

What happens next

• Formal redundancy consultations are expected to begin within weeks, starting with Integrated Care Boards and NHS England’s central offices.
   
• Timeline: Restructuring to begin in early 2026, with NHS England fully merged into the Department of Health by 2027.
   
• Budget clarity: Further funding and performance commitments will be detailed in Rachel Reeves’s 26 November Budget.
   

Conclusion

The £1 billion redundancy plan signals the government’s determination to reshape the NHS’s administrative backbone, betting that leaner management will translate into better patient care.

Whether the gamble pays off will depend on execution: how fairly the redundancies are managed, how effectively savings are redirected, and whether staff morale can survive another round of upheaval.

For now, the Treasury’s approval marks both an ending and a beginning — a cull of bureaucracy on paper, and the start of an uncertain transition for the people who keep Britain’s health service running.

For advice on public-sector redundancies, TUPE transfers, or consultation procedures, contact Parachute Law’s employment team.
 We help public bodies and employees navigate complex restructures lawfully and fairly.

Contact Us Now

Related Articles:

The Common Mistake People Make When Divorcing – and How to Avoid It

Interim Maintenance: Financial Support During Your Divorce

Divorce and Jurisdiction: Why the Country You Divorce In Can Shape Your Financial Future