Rachel Reeves Promises to Scrap “Needless Form Filling” in Major Push to Boost UK Business Growth

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced a sweeping package of deregulatory reforms aimed at reducing unnecessary administrative burdens on UK businesses, pledging to scrap what she called “needless form filling” and streamline corporate reporting requirements.

Speaking at a regional investment summit in Birmingham, Reeves said the measures were designed to create a more competitive, growth-oriented environment and position the UK as a leading destination for global capital. As companies prepare for the upcoming Budget, due next month, the government is facing increasing pressure to demonstrate that it can stimulate business activity without compromising workers’ rights or increasing the tax burden.

Below, Parachute Law breaks down what the government is proposing, what it means for employers and directors, and how the changes may reshape the regulatory landscape.

1. A “Pro-Business, Pro-Worker” Agenda — But Under Serious Scrutiny

Reeves began her remarks by acknowledging a sentiment widely shared across industries: that “for too many people, the economy is not working as it should.” Businesses have been vocal in recent months, arguing that rising employers’ National Insurance contributions and the new Employment Rights Bill are adding to the compliance load — not reducing it.

The chancellor countered these concerns by promising that her new deregulatory package would save firms nearly £6 billion a year by the end of this parliamentary term. For many businesses, especially small enterprises and family-run firms, this represents one of the most significant proposed reductions in administrative overhead in years.

The Treasury confirmed that the reforms include a major overhaul of corporate reporting rules, including a commitment to simplify parts of the merger and acquisition process and remove burdensome requirements for small businesses filing to Companies House.

This, Reeves argues, is key to restoring business confidence and supporting growth.

2. Companies House Forms: What Will Actually Change?

One of the headline reforms is the removal of lengthy reporting obligations for more than 100,000 small firms, including independent cafes, sole traders operating under corporate structures, and family-run shops.

Current reporting obligations for small companies include:

• Directors’ reports
   
• Strategic reports
   
• Detailed annual accounts
   
• Certain merger-related filings
   
• Beneficial ownership disclosures
   

The government says that many of these requirements are outdated, duplicative or disproportionate. Reeves framed the changes as “simpler corporate rules that let businesses focus on growth, not paperwork.”

Legal and practical implications

Businesses may see:

• Fewer mandatory narrative reports
   
• Reduced accounting disclosures
   
• Streamlined confirmation statements
   
• Shorter annual filing requirements
   
• Faster processing times at Companies House
   

However, Companies House has recently expanded its enforcement powers under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, meaning the reduction in paperwork will exist alongside more robust identity verification and fraud-prevention measures.

Businesses should expect a balance between reduced reporting volume and increased scrutiny in selected areas.

3. Reforming the Mergers Process — A Win for SMEs?

The government also signalled an intention to reform the merger approval process, which is governed by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). The CMA’s current approach is seen by many small businesses as overly complex, particularly for acquisitions or consolidations involving family businesses, local enterprises or early-stage companies.

Potential reforms could include:

• Shorter reporting thresholds
   
• Faster decisions on non-problematic mergers
   
• Exemptions for very small deals
   
• Reduced filing paperwork
   
• Clearer timelines for merger notifications
   

If implemented, these changes may reduce professional fees and administrative time for companies engaged in legitimate small-scale consolidations.

However, businesses entering into larger or potentially competition-sensitive mergers should expect the CMA’s scrutiny to remain unchanged — and may even increase following recent statutory reforms.

4. Temporary Deregulation for AI: Peter Kyle’s Proposal

Earlier in the day, Business Secretary Peter Kyle told the BBC that the government may introduce temporary exemptions from regulation for new AI applications, allowing emerging technologies to grow without early compliance burdens.

Kyle said:

“In certain circumstances… we can remove AI from regulation for a period of time to give it the space to grow, to develop, to be commercialised rapidly.”

According to Kyle, the aim is to harness AI to benefit healthcare, education, national productivity and economic growth.

Legal considerations

Temporarily exempting AI from regulation raises several important questions:

1. How will liability work?
    If AI systems malfunction or cause harm during an exemption period, where does responsibility lie?
    
2. How does this interact with data protection law?
    The UK GDPR continues to apply regardless of regulatory exemptions.
    
3. What safeguards exist for algorithmic bias or discrimination?
    
4. What happens when the exemption period ends?
    Companies may face a sudden compliance burden when regulation reactivates.
    

While businesses may welcome the breathing space, they must remain aware that general legal duties — such as safety, consumer protection and data rights — continue to apply regardless of sector-specific exemptions.

5. The Government’s Pledge: Reduce Regulatory Costs by 25%

This deregulatory push forms part of the government’s promise to cut the administrative cost of regulation by a quarter by the end of the parliamentary term.

Kyle criticised the previous government for failing to achieve meaningful deregulation after Brexit, saying:

“Some of the reporting required from directors is completely unnecessary. I’m eliminating a great deal of that today.”

This suggests the government is aiming for visible, measurable reductions in business paperwork — not simply rhetorical commitments.

Which areas may be targeted next?

Based on current signals:

• Environmental reporting
   
• Workplace reporting for SMEs
   
• Local authority licensing processes
   
• Digital compliance procedures
   
• Procurement documentation
   

If the government follows through, this could represent a sweeping transformation of UK business regulation.

6. Support, Skepticism and Industry Reaction

Business groups offered mixed responses.

British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) — broadly supportive

Deputy director Jane Gratton welcomed the plans:

“Unnecessary red tape ramps up costs and damages competitiveness.”

The BCC has long argued for simplification of corporate reporting and licensing requirements, especially for small firms.

Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) — cautious but hopeful

FSB policy chair Tina McKenzie warned that the announcement would “ring hollow” if the chancellor increases employer taxes in the upcoming Budget:

“Small firms have heard these warm words before.”

McKenzie stressed that compliance burdens include money, time and stress, and real change requires cross-government coordination.

British Retail Consortium — supportive but wary

Tom Ironside said retailers welcomed efforts to cut red tape, but warned that new policies are looming that may increase burdens instead of reducing them.

Liberal Democrats — criticism focused on Brexit bureaucracy

Lib Dem Treasury spokeswoman Daisy Cooper said the government could not claim to cut red tape while ignoring the “two billion extra pieces of paperwork created by Brexit.”

She argued that a bespoke UK–EU customs union would eliminate much of the post-Brexit administrative load.

7. Will Deregulation and Expanded Employment Rights Clash?

Business groups remain concerned that Labour’s Employment Rights Bill — which includes stronger protections for workers — may conflict with promises to reduce compliance burdens.

Potential areas of tension include:

• New reporting duties related to workplace rights
   
• Additional enforcement obligations
   
• Stronger whistleblowing protections
   
• Potential reforms to dismissal and probation laws
   
• Expanded rights for flexible and remote working
   

Kyle insisted the approach will be “pro-worker and pro-business”, but the balance between rights and compliance obligations will require careful legal drafting.

Any misalignment could lead to:

• Higher enforcement costs
   
• Legal disputes over employer duties
   
• Greater demand for HR compliance support
   

Businesses will need to stay attentive as legislation takes shape.

8. What This Means for Businesses Right Now

With the Budget approaching, companies should prepare for:

(1) Reduced reporting requirements

Less paperwork for small companies filing with Companies House.

(2) Potential tax changes

NI contributions and corporate taxes remain under scrutiny.

(3) Shifts in employment rights compliance

New obligations may appear even as other forms of reporting are reduced.

(4) AI regulatory experimentation

Temporary exemptions could create rapid opportunity — but also legal uncertainty.

(5) A changing mergers landscape

Simplified CMA processes may benefit smaller firms looking to consolidate.

In practice, business owners should review internal processes now, especially accounting, HR and data protection systems, to ensure they can adapt quickly to new rules.

9. Parachute Law’s View: This Is Deregulation with Legal Complexity Attached

While the chancellor frames these reforms as straightforward deregulatory measures, the legal reality is more nuanced:

• Fewer forms does not mean fewer legal obligations.
   
• AI exemptions could create liability uncertainty.
   
• Workers’ rights expansion will require careful compliance structures.
   
• Companies House is simultaneously simplifying reporting and increasing enforcement powers.
   
• Brexit-related trade administration is unlikely to shrink without structural reform.
   

Businesses should prepare not only for reduced paperwork but also a reshaped regulatory environment with new compliance challenges and evolving responsibilities.

Need help navigating regulatory change?

At Parachute Law, we support businesses with:

• Companies House compliance
   
• Directors’ duties and reporting
   
• Corporate restructuring and mergers
   
• Employment law obligations
   
• Regulatory risk assessments
   
• AI governance and data protection
   
• Post-Brexit customs and trade requirements
   

Speak to our legal team today for clear, practical guidance on how these reforms could affect your business.

Contact Us Now

Related Reading:

2025 Standard Crime Contract: Welcome Packs, Key Changes, and Resources for Providers

Civil News: Legal Aid Opportunities in Housing and Debt

Best Small Business and Start-Up Grants and Loans in the UK