UK’s Fiscal Watchdog Poised to Slash Growth Forecasts as Reeves Prepares Tax-Raising Budget
Key Takeaways:
- Growth forecasts set to fall — The OBR is expected to downgrade economic growth projections for 2026 and the remaining years of the parliament, signalling weaker long-term performance.
- Major fiscal gap emerging — The downgrade, combined with higher debt-servicing costs, is likely to leave a £20–30 billion hole in the public finances that the Chancellor must address.
- Tax rises increasingly unavoidable — With limited fiscal headroom, Rachel Reeves is widely expected to announce new revenue-raising measures in Wednesday’s Budget to maintain economic stability.
Britain’s fragile economic outlook is set to take another hit this week, with the country’s fiscal watchdog preparing to downgrade its growth forecasts for 2026 and the remaining years of the current parliament. The revised projections, to be released alongside Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Budget on Wednesday, could reshape the Government’s entire fiscal plan and intensify pressure for new tax rises.
Sky News first reported the downgrade on Monday, citing sources familiar with the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) internal modelling. The OBR had already been expected to revise down its key productivity assumptions — a move that economists warned would create a significant shortfall in the public finances. But the latest revelation suggests the economic downgrade will be deeper and more prolonged than previously anticipated.
For Reeves, who entered office with a pledge to restore stability to Britain’s fiscal landscape, the timing could not be more critical. Her first full Budget will now be delivered against a backdrop of weaker growth, higher borrowing costs, and mounting demands on public services — leaving few easy options for balancing the books.
What the OBR Downgrade Means for the UK
The OBR’s forecasts are not merely technical projections: they determine the fiscal headroom available to the Government, shape the tax and spending decisions within a Budget, and influence borrowing costs in financial markets. When productivity growth expectations fall, long-term economic output decreases, reducing future tax revenue and widening the deficit.
According to the report, Reeves is preparing for a £20–30 billion hit to Britain’s public finances. This shortfall is expected to stem from three primary factors:
- Weaker medium-term growth
Lower GDP projections reduce expected tax receipts and increase the relative burden of public debt.
- Rising debt-servicing costs
Higher interest rates over the past two years have significantly increased the cost of government borrowing.
- Existing structural pressures
Demand for healthcare, social care, and public sector pay settlements continues to climb, placing the Treasury under sustained pressure.
A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment on the report, but the implications are clear: Reeves will almost certainly need to raise taxes, cut spending, or introduce structural reforms to keep the Government on track with its fiscal rules.
How We Got Here: The UK’s Stuttering Growth Environment
Economic growth in the UK has struggled to rebound fully since the pandemic, with long-standing structural weaknesses playing a prominent role. Productivity — the amount of output produced per hour worked — has been stuck in a near-flat trajectory since the 2008 financial crisis. Business investment has also stagnated, partly due to political instability and Brexit-related uncertainty.
Inflation, which surged to multi-decade highs in 2022, has fallen back toward the Bank of England’s target, but it has left households and businesses financially stretched. While wage growth has improved in some sectors, real incomes remain under pressure.
This environment has made fiscal policymaking far more complicated. The Government faces urgent demands to fund public services, reform social care, improve infrastructure, and support green transition projects — all while maintaining credibility with financial markets and keeping debt on a sustainable path.
Reeves Faces a Tough Balancing Act
The Chancellor has repeatedly pledged to provide a “stable, responsible” approach to managing the economy. But Wednesday’s Budget appears likely to test that promise.
If the OBR confirms a downgrade as expected, Reeves may be left with no choice but to raise taxes — a politically contentious move that risks contradicting Labour’s pre-election messaging. Though the party committed not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT, it left the door open to adjustments in other areas.
Possible areas under consideration include:
1. Wealth and Asset-Based Taxes
Reeves is widely expected to target wealthier households and high-value properties. Reports in recent days suggest she is preparing a form of mansion tax on homes worth more than £2 million, potentially raising up to £450 million annually.
This move would dovetail with Labour’s broader narrative of “fairness” while avoiding more painful tax rises on working households.
2. Corporate Windfall Measures
A levy on bank profits — similar to measures taken during earlier periods of financial turbulence — is also being explored. Former prime minister Gordon Brown has been among those calling for a targeted tax on gambling firms’ profits, which could also feature in the Budget.
3. Closing Loopholes and Reforming Reliefs
The Treasury may target inheritance tax loopholes, business asset reliefs, or capital gains allowances, though any such changes would likely be phased in to minimise market disruption.
4. Freezing or Slowing the Uprating of Thresholds
Though technically not classed as a “tax rise,” freezing thresholds for income tax or national insurance can generate billions in additional revenue through fiscal drag. However, such a move risks breaching the literal wording of Labour’s manifesto commitments, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Reeves has stressed that “there will be no return to the chaos of the past,” but analysts note that without major reforms, fiscal consolidation will be unavoidable.
Market Reaction: Caution, Not Panic
Financial markets are watching developments closely, but the reaction has so far been measured. Investors have long expected a downgrade in growth, and gilt yields — a proxy for government borrowing costs — have remained broadly stable.
Economists say the credibility of the Budget will matter more than the downgrade itself. Markets want to see:
- a clear medium-term plan to stabilise debt
- credible assumptions around productivity and investment
- avoidance of short-term political gimmicks
- genuine structural reforms that support growth
If Reeves delivers such a plan, the downgrade may not significantly affect borrowing costs. If she fails to demonstrate fiscal discipline, however, the UK could again face the kind of volatility seen after the 2022 mini-budget.
Business Community Calls for “Hard Choices”
Businesses have been vocal in calling for certainty and long-term strategy. Employers’ groups have urged Reeves to make the “hard choices” necessary to put the economy on a sustainable path — even if that involves politically unpopular decisions.
Their main priorities include:
- reforming planning rules to boost construction and infrastructure
- incentivising investment in technology, automation and upskilling
- easing energy costs for industry
- strengthening trade routes post-Brexit
Failure to address these issues, they warn, could deepen the productivity crisis and worsen the budgetary shortfall.
A Growing List of Fiscal Pressures
The OBR downgrade comes at a time when the Government is already facing an unusually dense cluster of fiscal challenges:
• Public Services Under Strain
Years of underinvestment have left many departments — particularly the NHS — struggling to maintain service levels.
• Ageing Population
Demographic changes mean rising costs for pensions, healthcare and adult social care.
• Cost of Borrowing
Government debt servicing now consumes around £100 billion annually — more than the education budget.
• Infrastructure Commitments
Labour has pledged major spending on green energy, transport and housing, all of which require stable financing.
Against this backdrop, Reeves’s room for manoeuvre is limited.
Political Risks Ahead
Labour swept to power promising both economic stability and improved living standards. But the combination of weak growth and tight fiscal rules now complicates that mission.
If Reeves opts for tax rises, Labour risks criticism from both voters and business leaders. If she opts for spending restraint, she may undermine the Government’s ability to deliver on health, education and housing.
The Budget will therefore be a defining moment for Labour’s economic credibility — not just domestically, but internationally. Global investors and rating agencies will be watching closely to see whether Reeves can deliver stability without sacrificing ambition.
Conclusion: The Next 72 Hours Could Redefine Labour’s Economic Strategy
The forecast downgrade from the OBR sets the stage for one of the most consequential Budgets in recent memory. With growth shrinking, borrowing costs rising, and public services under strain, the Government must now navigate a treacherous fiscal landscape.
Reeves’s challenge is clear: she must find a way to plug a £20–30 billion hole without undermining confidence, breaking key promises, or stalling the wider economic recovery.
Whether she chooses targeted tax measures, structural reforms, or a mix of both, Wednesday’s Budget will reveal how Labour intends to steer Britain through the years ahead — and how much political capital the Chancellor is willing to spend to deliver a credible, sustainable plan.
Related Articles:
The Common Mistake People Make When Divorcing – and How to Avoid It
Interim Maintenance: Financial Support During Your Divorce
Divorce and Jurisdiction: Why the Country You Divorce In Can Shape Your Financial Future