Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood Threatens Trump-Style Visa Bans in Radical New Asylum Reform Package

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is set to unveil what she calls “the most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times”—a package of legislative changes that could dramatically reshape the UK’s immigration and asylum system. The announcement, scheduled for today in the House of Commons, signals a decisive and controversial shift in the government’s approach to border control.

Among the most headline-grabbing proposals is a Trump-style visa ban against three African countries—Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo—should they fail to cooperate in accepting the return of their nationals who are in the UK unlawfully.

Mahmood’s language has been unusually uncompromising for a Labour home secretary. She claims illegal migration is “tearing our country apart” and insists the reforms are essential to restore public confidence in the system.

Below, Parachute Law breaks down what the changes mean, the legal implications, and how they could affect asylum seekers, families, employers, and British citizens with ties abroad.

1. Visa Sanctions on Angola, Namibia & DRC: What Is Being Proposed?

Under the new plans, the UK will introduce visa penalties similar to measures used by the Trump administration in the US. These sanctions would target:

• Tourists
   
• Business travellers
   
• VIP or diplomatic visitors
   

If these governments do not increase cooperation in taking back their nationals who have no legal right to remain in the UK, Mahmood says they will “lose the privilege of entering our country”.

This could include:

• Suspended visa routes
   
• Longer processing times
   
• Higher visa fees
   
• Full visa bans
   

Such sanctions have rarely been used by the UK. Legally, the Home Secretary has the power to introduce visa restrictions under the Immigration Act 1971, but using them as a tool of diplomatic pressure marks a more aggressive policy direction.

Legal Commentary (Parachute Law)
 Visa sanctions tend to trigger counter-measures. Citizens with family in these countries, UK employers who rely on African market relationships, and individuals sponsoring relatives may face delays or uncertainty if reciprocal restrictions are imposed.

2. A Danish-Style Asylum System: What the UK Is Adopting

The reforms are heavily modelled on Denmark’s approach, which aims to make the country less attractive to irregular migrants. This includes:

• Temporary refugee status
   
• Restricted family reunification
   
• Removal once home countries are declared safe
   
• Outsourced or fast-tracked asylum processing
   

Mahmood argues these changes will help “restore public consent” for the asylum system.

3. Permanent Settlement Delayed: 20-Year Wait for Refugees

One of the most significant proposals is a 20-year wait before refugees can apply for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR).

Current UK rules generally allow refugees to apply for settlement after five years, meaning this proposal would quadruple the wait.

Refugees would also:

• Hold temporary status
   
• Undergo regular status reviews
   
• Face removal as soon as their home country is deemed safe
   

Legal Commentary
 Extending the settlement timeline creates long-term instability for refugees and their family members. Frequent reassessment also increases the administrative burden and legal costs. For people already traumatised by conflict or persecution, prolonged uncertainty can significantly affect mental health, employment, and integration.

4. Narrowing Article 8 Rights: Family Life Protections Reduced

The Home Secretary intends to legislate changes to how Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights—the right to respect for private and family life—is applied in immigration appeals.

Key elements:

• Only those with immediate family in the UK—parents, children, and possibly spouses—will be able to rely on Article 8 to fight deportation.
   
• Extended family (siblings, adult children, dependants, grandparents) may no longer qualify.
   
• Judges will be legally required to prioritise public safety over family life arguments.
   

Essentially, Article 8 will be re-weighted to favour state interests over personal rights in removal cases.

Legal Commentary
 This is a substantial shift. Article 8 is one of the most commonly invoked grounds in immigration appeals. Narrowing it could dramatically reduce successful challenges against deportation, even where strong family bonds exist.

This may face legal challenges, especially where children are involved, as UK courts must still comply with the Children Act 1989 and the principle that a child’s best interests be a primary consideration.

5. Appeals Restricted: One Attempt Only

Another core reform is eliminating repeated appeals. Mahmood plans to stop “multiple attempts to appeal against refusals for asylum”.

In practice, this likely includes:

• Limits on fresh claims
   
• Removal of repeated appeals based on new evidence
   
• Removal of judicial review options
   
• Stricter deadlines and expedited processing
   

Legal Commentary
 While this may reduce what critics call “abuse of process”, it also risks returning vulnerable people to danger if genuine evidence emerges later. Many asylum seekers obtain key documents only after arrival or after initial refusals, often due to trauma, language barriers, or inability to obtain evidence from oppressive or unstable countries.

6. Housing & Allowances No Longer Guaranteed

Under current rules, asylum seekers who cannot support themselves are entitled to:

• Basic accommodation
   
• Weekly financial support
   
• Access to essential services
   

The new proposals remove the guarantee of both housing and allowances. Provision may become discretionary or tied to stricter eligibility tests.

Legal Commentary
 This aligns with policies in some EU states but may encounter legal challenges under human rights, anti-destitution, and safeguarding obligations—especially regarding pregnant women, children, and trafficking victims.

7. AI-Driven Age Tests and New Work/Study Caps

New measures also introduce the use of facial age estimation technology, a form of AI, to combat adults posing as minors.

Additionally:

• Refugees will have capped access to work and study rights
   
• New “safe and legal routes” for genuine refugees are planned
   

Legal Commentary
 Age disputes are already contentious. AI-based age estimation may be challenged for reliability, bias, and due process concerns. Courts may require significant expert evidence before accepting AI-based conclusions.

8. A New Independent Removal Body

Mahmood plans to establish a Danish-style removal authority to speed up deportations of:

• Dangerous criminals
   
• Failed asylum seekers
   
• Individuals posing a security risk
   

Fast-tracked removals would aim to limit last-minute legal challenges.

9. Political Reaction: Praise, Outrage & Legal Doubts

Labour Leadership

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer endorsed the reforms, saying border security must be restored while Britain remains a “fair and compassionate country”.

Conservatives

Kemi Badenoch claimed Mahmood’s proposals were “weak” and offered to help draft a more stringent plan.

Reform UK

Nigel Farage said Mahmood “sounds like a Reform supporter” but argued the changes will fail due to the Human Rights Act and the UK’s membership in the ECHR.

Refugee Council

The Refugee Council warned the reforms will cost £872m over ten years and will “unfairly prevent men, women and children from integrating into British life”.

10. Legal Risks: Will These Reforms Survive the Courts?

Several elements may face judicial scrutiny:

• The narrowing of Article 8
   
• AI-driven age assessments
   
• Removal of guaranteed asylum support
   
• Visa sanctions potentially breaching diplomatic agreements
   
• 20-year settlement delays
   
• Restriction of appeal rights
   

The UK is still bound by international refugee and human rights law, including:

• The 1951 Refugee Convention
   
• The ECHR
   
• The Human Rights Act 1998
   
• UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
   

Any reforms must be consistent with these obligations.

11. How This Could Affect You – Parachute Law Guidance

These reforms may impact:

Families with non-UK relatives

Restrictions on Article 8 could affect family reunification and appeal rights.

Employers

Visa sanctions could disrupt business travel from affected regions.

Asylum seekers currently in the UK

You may face new temporary status rules, limited appeal rights, and reassessments.

Those preparing asylum or human rights claims

Evidence and legal advice will become more critical as routes narrow.

UK citizens sponsoring partners or dependent relatives

Delays or increased refusal risks may arise if their country of origin faces sanctions.

Need Expert Immigration or Asylum Advice?

Reforms of this scale will reshape how the UK handles immigration and asylum for years to come. If you or your family may be affected, it is essential to receive accurate legal guidance.

At Parachute Law, we assist with:

• Asylum claims
   
• Human rights applications
   
• Family life appeals (Article 8 ECHR)
   
• Deportation challenges
   
• Settlement and ILR applications
   
• Sponsor and visa applications
   
• Evidence preparation and legal representation
   

Speak to our immigration team today
 We offer fast, clear legal advice with fixed-fee options to make the process straightforward and accessible.

Contact Us Now

Related Reading:

How to Invest Under the UK’s New Property Fault Line

ToLATA Claims Solicitors

What’s Happening With UK House Prices? Latest Market Moves and 2025 Forecasts