Russian Oligarch Divorce Battle Lands in London: What the Court of Appeal Ruling Means for High-Value Divorce Claims
The English Court of Appeal has ruled that Natalia Potanina, ex-wife of Russian billionaire Vladimir Potanin, can pursue a multi-billion dollar financial claim in London. This development opens the door to what could be one of the largest divorce cases ever heard in the UK.
Potanin, the chief executive of Norilsk Nickel (Nornickel), the world’s biggest palladium producer and a leading refined nickel supplier, controls a 37% stake in the company. That holding is valued at nearly $9 billion, according to recent MOEX figures. Potanina is seeking 50% of her ex-husband’s beneficial interest in those shares, alongside half of the dividends paid since their 2014 divorce and ownership of a luxury Moscow property reportedly worth around $150 million.
Her lawyers argue that the settlement she received in Russia—just $41.5 million, or less than 1% of the couple’s assets—was grossly inadequate. Potanin contests that she received closer to $84 million and maintains the case has no business being tried in London.
Yet, the Court of Appeal disagreed. By overturning the High Court’s earlier refusal, the judges have set the stage for a potentially landmark case in international divorce law.
Why This Case Matters
This dispute isn’t only about the staggering sums involved. It highlights broader issues around jurisdiction, fairness, and “divorce tourism”—a term critics use to describe individuals choosing England as their battleground because of its reputation for generous spousal awards.
1. The Generous English Court System
England and Wales are widely regarded as one of the most favourable jurisdictions for financially weaker spouses. Courts apply the principle of fair sharing, often starting from the assumption of a 50/50 split of marital assets. Judges have wide discretion to ensure both parties’ needs are met, especially after long marriages.
For high-net-worth couples, that can translate into eye-watering settlements. London has been dubbed the “divorce capital of the world” precisely because it is willing to scrutinise global wealth structures, trusts, and offshore holdings.
2. Discrepancy with Foreign Settlements
Potanina’s position is that the Russian courts left her with a fraction of the marital wealth. The Court of Appeal noted that the disparity between what she received in Russia and what she might have received in England was significant, justifying her attempt to seek justice here.
3. Severing Ties with Russia
One key factor was that Potanina had largely severed her ties with Russia. The Court of Appeal found that she had established sufficient connections elsewhere to ground jurisdiction in England. This opens the way for spouses who may have been disadvantaged abroad to seek financial relief under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984.
The Legal Background: Part III Applications
Potanina’s case is proceeding under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984). This legislation allows a spouse who has divorced abroad to apply for financial relief in England and Wales if the foreign court’s settlement was inadequate and the applicant has a sufficient connection to England.
The law aims to prevent injustice in overseas divorces, but it also seeks to limit forum shopping. Courts must balance two competing principles:
- Respecting the outcome of foreign legal systems.
- Ensuring spouses are not left destitute or unfairly treated.
The Potanin case squarely tests those limits.
Divorce Tourism vs. Justice
When London’s High Court originally refused Potanina’s application in 2019, the judge warned of the dangers of “divorce tourism”. If wealthy ex-spouses could simply shop around for the friendliest court, it could flood the English system with international claims.
However, the Court of Appeal’s reversal signals that, in cases of gross inequality, the courts will prioritise fairness over jurisdictional caution.
This does not mean every foreign divorce can be retried in England. Applicants must show:
- A significant connection with England (residence, property, or other ties).
- A substantial injustice in the foreign settlement.
- That it is appropriate for an English court to intervene.
Financial Stakes: Billions at Play
Potanin’s 37% stake in Nornickel alone is worth nearly $9 billion. If Potanina succeeds in her claim for half, this could dwarf even the most famous UK divorce cases, such as:
- Tatiana Akhmedova v Farkhad Akhmedov (2016): £453 million award.
- Chris Hohn v Jamie Cooper-Hohn (2014): £337 million award.
By contrast, Potanina’s Russian award of $41.5 million looks strikingly modest.
Practical Lessons for High-Net-Worth Divorce Cases
This case offers several takeaways for couples with international assets or connections:
Jurisdiction Shopping is Real
Where you divorce matters. England’s courts are often far more generous than other jurisdictions.
Part III Applications Provide a Safety Net
Even after a foreign divorce, you may be able to seek additional relief in England if the settlement was inadequate.
Complex Assets Are in Play
English courts can and will investigate trusts, company holdings, and overseas property.
Evidence of Connection is Crucial
Simply preferring English courts isn’t enough. Applicants must show they have made England their home or otherwise have a tangible link.
Delays Are Costly
Potanina has already been in litigation for nearly a decade. Protracted proceedings can be financially and emotionally draining.
Implications for Wealthy International Couples
This ruling reinforces London’s reputation as a global hub for divorce litigation. For ultra-high-net-worth couples with cross-border ties, it raises key questions:
- Will foreign divorce settlements face increased scrutiny in England?
- Could this embolden more spouses to bring Part III applications?
- How might English courts handle politically sensitive cases involving sanctioned individuals or oligarchs?
The answers will shape not only Potanin’s future but also the strategy of lawyers advising international clients.
How Parachute Law Can Help
At Parachute Law, we specialise in complex divorce cases, financial settlements, and cross-border disputes. Whether you are a high-net-worth individual, or the spouse of one, our team provides:
- Strategic advice on jurisdiction and whether England is the right place to bring your claim.
- Expert handling of financial disclosure, trusts, and hidden assets.
- Practical guidance to protect your rights while minimising delay and cost.
We understand the unique pressures of cases that span multiple countries, legal systems, and financial structures. Our goal is to ensure you receive a fair settlement—wherever your marriage took place.
Key Takeaway
The Potanin case is more than a billionaire divorce battle. It is a test of the English court’s willingness to intervene in foreign divorces where justice was not served. The Court of Appeal’s ruling shows that England remains committed to fairness, even when the assets in question run into the billions.
For spouses facing inequality after an overseas divorce, the message is clear: England may still offer a second chance at justice.
Next Steps
If you are considering divorce or financial relief in England after an overseas settlement, contact Parachute Law today. Our experienced family law solicitors can:
- Assess your eligibility for a Part III MFPA 1984 claim.
- Help you secure full and fair disclosure of assets.
- Guide you through settlement negotiations or litigation.
Related Reading:
How to Invest Under the UK’s New Property Fault Line
What’s Happening With UK House Prices? Latest Market Moves and 2025 Forecasts
