Proposed Changes to Divorce Law Could End the Blame Game

Proposed reforms to Northern Ireland’s divorce laws could fundamentally change the way couples legally separate, potentially bringing an end to what many family law professionals describe as an outdated and emotionally damaging “blame game”.

A public consultation launched by the Northern Ireland Executive is examining whether the current fault-based divorce system should be replaced or reformed. The proposals would align Northern Ireland more closely with divorce laws already in force in England and Wales, where no-fault divorce was introduced in 2022, and with elements of the system used in the Republic of Ireland.

At the heart of the debate is a central question: should the law require couples to assign blame for the breakdown of a marriage, or should it simply recognise that some relationships end and allow people to separate with dignity and minimal conflict?

How divorce currently works in Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland has some of the most restrictive divorce laws in the UK. Under the current framework, couples cannot apply for a divorce within the first two years of marriage. After that period, a divorce petition must rely on one of a limited number of legally recognised grounds.

These grounds include:

• Two years’ separation with the consent of the other spouse
• Five years’ separation without consent
• Unreasonable behaviour
• Adultery
• Desertion

The same structure applies to the dissolution of civil partnerships, with the exception of adultery.

While separation is now the most commonly cited reason for divorce, many couples still rely on fault-based grounds, particularly unreasonable behaviour, to avoid waiting years before being legally able to end their marriage.

Critics argue that this creates an artificial incentive to exaggerate or weaponise past conflicts simply to meet legal requirements, even where both parties privately accept that the relationship has broken down.

Why critics say the system is outdated

Family law practitioners and relationship counsellors have long argued that the existing system no longer reflects modern relationships or social realities.

Joan Davis, Chief Executive of Relate NI, has described the law as outdated and poorly suited to contemporary family life. In her view, forcing couples to remain legally tied to one another long after a relationship has ended only increases stress, anxiety, and emotional harm.

From a counselling perspective, the most significant problem is the delay built into the system. Couples may emotionally separate years before the law allows them to formalise that separation, leaving them stuck in limbo.

For families with children, this limbo can be particularly damaging. Parents may struggle to establish stable post-separation arrangements while still legally married, and unresolved legal ties can fuel ongoing conflict.

The impact of blame on families and children

One of the strongest arguments for reform is the effect fault-based divorce can have on children.

Where one parent must formally accuse the other of wrongdoing, those allegations inevitably shape how each parent is perceived. Even when children are shielded from the details, the emotional fallout often seeps into family life.

Relationship professionals warn that attributing blame at the legal end of a relationship can undermine co-parenting, making it harder for children to maintain healthy relationships with both parents.

Once legal proceedings frame one parent as “at fault”, it becomes far more difficult to foster cooperation, trust, and mutual respect—qualities that are essential when parents must continue to share responsibility for their children long after the marriage ends.

Divorce and mental health

The emotional toll of divorce is well documented, but the adversarial nature of fault-based proceedings can intensify that impact.

Divorce often coincides with major life upheaval: changes in housing, finances, daily routines, and identity. When the legal process adds conflict and blame to an already distressing situation, it can worsen anxiety, depression, and emotional burnout.

Mental health organisations consistently report elevated levels of psychological distress following relationship breakdown. Critics of the current law argue that forcing couples to re-litigate the worst moments of their relationship for legal purposes serves no meaningful public interest.

Instead of helping people move forward, they argue, the law often traps families in cycles of resentment and recrimination.

Political support for reform

The consultation has received backing from senior figures within the Northern Ireland Executive. Finance Minister John O’Dowd has said that reform could significantly reduce conflict in divorce and dissolution proceedings.

While acknowledging that many marriages are happy and long-lasting, he has emphasised that when relationships do break down, the law should avoid adding unnecessary strain—particularly where children are involved.

Supporters of reform stress that changing the legal process does not undermine marriage itself. Instead, they argue, it recognises that the purpose of divorce law is not to punish failure, but to manage the consequences of relationship breakdown in a fair and humane way.

Lessons from England and Wales

England and Wales introduced no-fault divorce in April 2022, allowing couples to apply for divorce without assigning blame or proving misconduct.

Under that system, one or both parties can make a statement that the marriage has irretrievably broken down. The process includes a minimum timeframe—often around six months—from application to final order, intended to provide a period for reflection while avoiding prolonged delay.

Family law specialists report that the reform has largely achieved its aims: reducing hostility, lowering legal costs, and making the process more accessible.

Importantly, no-fault divorce has not led to a sudden spike in divorce rates. Instead, it has changed how couples exit marriages that were already ending, shifting the focus away from conflict and towards resolution.

Concerns about making divorce “too easy”

Not everyone supports reform. Critics argue that removing fault risks trivialising marriage and weakening its legal and moral significance.

Some faith-based organisations have raised concerns that liberalising divorce law could lead to rushed decisions, encouraging couples to end marriages during periods of temporary difficulty rather than working through problems.

They also argue that fault-based grounds provide important legal recognition of serious wrongdoing, such as adultery or abuse, and that removing these options could deny individuals a sense of justice.

Others warn that accelerating the divorce process could push couples into binding financial or parenting arrangements at a time when emotions are still raw.

Addressing the concerns

Supporters of reform respond that no-fault divorce does not prevent wrongdoing from being acknowledged where relevant. Allegations of abuse, coercive control, or financial misconduct can still be addressed through other legal routes, including protective orders and financial proceedings.

They also note that no-fault systems do not eliminate reflection periods entirely. Rather, they replace years-long delays with structured, time-limited processes that balance emotional space with legal clarity.

In practice, the decision to divorce is rarely impulsive. By the time legal proceedings begin, most couples have already reached a settled conclusion that the relationship is over.

The options under consultation

The Executive’s consultation outlines three main options.

Option one: retain the current system

This would involve no change to existing law, keeping fault-based grounds and separation periods intact.

Option two: introduce an administrative no-fault divorce

This model would mirror the system used in England and Wales. A single party or joint application could be made based on irretrievable breakdown, without attributing blame. The process would be largely administrative, with a defined minimum timeframe.

Option three: a no-fault model based on the Republic of Ireland

This approach would also remove fault, but would retain a longer separation requirement. Couples would need to demonstrate that they have lived apart for at least two of the previous three years and that reconciliation is not possible.

Each option reflects a different balance between accessibility, reflection, and legal formality.

What reform could mean in practice

If Northern Ireland adopts a no-fault model, the most immediate change would be cultural rather than legal. Divorce would shift away from being a forum for assigning blame and towards a process focused on resolution and future arrangements.

Family lawyers anticipate fewer contested petitions, lower legal costs, and less emotional damage for families—particularly children.

There may also be wider benefits for the court system, with reduced caseloads and fewer disputes driven purely by procedural necessity.

A changing understanding of divorce

The consultation reflects a broader shift in how society understands marriage and divorce. Relationships today are shaped by different expectations, pressures, and social norms than those that existed when Northern Ireland’s divorce laws were first enacted more than half a century ago.

Reform does not suggest that marriage has lost its value. Instead, it acknowledges that when relationships end, the law should prioritise dignity, wellbeing, and the long-term interests of families.

Conclusion

The proposed changes to Northern Ireland’s divorce law represent an opportunity to modernise a system widely regarded as out of step with contemporary life.

By reducing the need for blame, reform could ease emotional distress, protect children from unnecessary conflict, and allow families to move forward with greater clarity and compassion.

As the consultation continues, the challenge for policymakers will be to strike the right balance: preserving the seriousness of marriage while ensuring that, when relationships do end, the law does not make an already painful process even harder.

What is clear is that the conversation around divorce is no longer just about legal technicalities. It is about how society supports people at one of the most difficult moments of their lives—and whether the law should inflame conflict or help bring it to an end.

Contact Us Now

Related Articles

How to Prepare for Your First Meeting with a Divorce Solicitor

Virtual Hearings in Family Law: How to Prepare and Present Yourself

Divorce Day: New Year, New Beginnings?