‘They Know Britain Is a Soft Country’: The Visa Overstayers Living Under the Radar
Key Takeaways:
- Overstayer numbers are unknown but likely high — With the Home Office not collecting data for over five years, immigration lawyers estimate there may be 200,000–400,000 people overstaying visas in the UK.
- Hidden communities rely on cash-in-hand work — Many overstayers survive through informal labour networks within South Asian and African diaspora communities, often earning well below legal wage levels.
- Fear and exploitation define daily life — Individuals like “Ramesh” and “Anike” live in constant fear of removal, while lacking legal protections and facing exploitation due to their precarious status.
For more than five years, the UK government has collected no reliable data on the number of people overstaying their visas. The figure once existed—imperfect though it was—but today, there is no official count, no accurate estimate, and no audited method of understanding the scale of what ministers routinely describe as “abuse of the immigration system”.
Yet beneath that void in official information, community leaders, lawyers, and those experiencing the system first-hand paint a stark picture: a shadow population surviving on low wages, relying on established diaspora networks, and living in constant fear that a siren, a letter, or a knock on the door could change their life.
One immigration lawyer believes the number of visa overstayers may now be as high as 400,000. If true, it represents one of the least understood migration pressures in Britain—and one of the most politically sensitive.
A Life Built on Fear
For “Ramesh”, a 32-year-old from India, fear has become a daily companion. A police siren is enough to make him freeze. His hands shake as he describes how carefully he plans each journey, each visit to the Gurdwara where he receives food, support, and occasional work connections.
Ramesh arrived in 2023 on a student visa but saw his future unravel after a serious accident left him unable to continue his studies. His visa was cancelled; he remained.
“I can’t go back,” he says quietly. Back in India, he claims, his political activism exposed him to persecution. The UK, he insists, felt like the only safe option.
But safety has come at a heavy price. He now works on building sites and home extensions—cash in hand, no rights, no protections—for barely £50 for nine hours’ labour.
“It’s impossible to live here without my Indian or Pakistani community,” he says. “They give me work—cleaning, labouring, whatever needs doing. Without them, I would be homeless.”
Ramesh knows his situation is precarious. He avoids hospitals, avoids travel, avoids unnecessary attention. “Every day is fear,” he repeats.
Twelve Years in Limbo
While Ramesh’s story is recent, Anike, a Nigerian woman living in Greater Manchester, has spent more than a decade navigating uncertainty.
She entered the UK legally on a multi-entry visa when her sister Esther was diagnosed with a brain tumour. She was supposed to stay only three months. But complications from Esther’s surgery left Esther dependent on her sister for care.
Twelve years later, Anike remains in limbo. She must digitally sign in monthly with immigration officials. Her seven applications for leave to remain on compassionate grounds have been rejected.
She describes herself as exhausted by the process. “Everybody is thinking, ‘What will become of people like us?’ The mood is changing. You can feel it everywhere.”
Her fear is not just deportation, but the loss of stability, the loss of purpose, the collapse of a life built around caregiving. Yet she cannot envision leaving her sister.
Her case reflects a growing emotional and administrative gulf: overstayers who are not absconding, not hiding, yet still unable to regularise their status even when deeply rooted in local communities.
How Many Overstayers Are Really in Britain?
The answer should be simple. It is not.
The Home Office has not collated any visa overstayer data for more than five years, after the department acknowledged the previous figures were “unreliable”. Combined with the lack of systematic exit checks, no authoritative mechanism exists to track who leaves and who remains.
Immigration lawyer Harjap Singh Bhangal says the numbers are far higher than the government recognises publicly.
“Every day I see at least one overstayer,” he says. “Any immigration lawyer will say the same. It is the bulk of our work. At this time, there’s definitely in excess of 200,000 people. It might be closer to 300,000. It could even be 400,000.”
He is blunt about the structural problems behind these estimates: “The Home Office is a shambles. We don’t have exit controls. We don’t have accurate data. It’s an institution where every wall in the building is cracked.”
The lack of data complicates policymaking, fuels mistrust, and allows competing narratives to flourish—from claims of mass exploitation by illegal workers to accusations of chronic governmental neglect.
The Kingsbury Example: ‘Mini-Mumbai’
In Kingsbury, northwest London, residents say the area has undergone a rapid transformation in the past five years. Post-Brexit visa routes created fresh opportunities for overseas visitors—opportunities some are alleged to have abused.
A local community organiser, who does not wish to be identified, is unequivocal.
“They’re laughing at us because they know Britain is a soft country, where you won’t be picked up easily,” he says.
He describes witnessing a surge in arrivals from South Asia who enter on visitor visas. Many, he claims, have no intention of leaving after six months.
“This area is easy to live in because they know they can survive. It looks like you’re walking through mini-Mumbai.”
Even more troubling are claims of visa facilitation rings: strangers posing as friends or relatives to help secure visitor visas for economic migrants who seek work in construction, cleaning, or hospitality.
“I’ve come across so many people who’ve come this way,” he adds. “It’s widespread. People talk openly—‘someone else is coming tomorrow, the day after’.”
Because overstayers are hidden in informal work networks, they do not generally claim benefits. But they can still access emergency healthcare, and their children can attend school—costs ultimately met by taxpayers.
“And who is paying for it?” he asks rhetorically. “It’s the taxpayers who are paying for all this.”
The Cash-in-Hand Economy
Perhaps the hardest element to quantify is the informal labour market that sustains many overstayers. Cash-only jobs in private homes, small businesses, and labouring roles allow people without legal status to survive, but at the expense of their security and rights.
Many accept wages far below legal minimums. Others live in overcrowded houses or rely entirely on ethnic or religious communities for shelter and work.
The system incentivises exploitation—a structural by-product of unclear visa categories, long processing times, and a lack of enforcement capacity.
Community leaders privately warn that some overstayers fall into debt bondage: paying high fees to agents who secure them entry, then working illegally to repay the debt.
With no formal data, the scale of exploitation remains speculative but troubling.
Public Mood and Political Pressure
As migration dominates British politics, overstayers find themselves caught between shifting policies and rising public anxiety.
Some fear a harsher enforcement environment.
Others fear being scapegoated for wider migration challenges.
The Home Office insists it is acting decisively. A spokesperson said:
“We will not tolerate abuse of our immigration system and anyone found breaking the rules will be liable to enforcement action. In the first year of this government, we have returned 35,000 people with no right to be here—a 13% rise. Arrests and raids for illegal working are at their highest levels since records began.”
Yet critics argue that enforcement spikes remain superficial solutions to a deeper structural problem: an immigration system unable to track entry and exit, unable to process cases quickly, and unable to distinguish clearly between malicious overstayers and those trapped by circumstance.
Human Stories Behind a Policy Vacuum
Behind every statistic—real or estimated—is a human story that rarely fits neatly into political narratives.
Ramesh fears for his life if he returns to India.
Anike fears abandoning her sister during life-threatening illness.
Others fear destitution, violence, or persecution at home.
Some overstayers knowingly break the rules for economic opportunity.
Others fall through the cracks due to illness, administrative delays, or sudden life crises.
But all share one common reality: they live in a country that neither fully recognises them nor fully records them.
What Happens Now?
With migration at the centre of Britain’s political discourse, pressure is mounting for the government to restore reliable overstayer data. Without it, policies risk being built on assumptions rather than evidence.
Community leaders warn that parts of Britain have quietly adapted to an underground workforce—one that is increasingly exploited and invisible.
For Ramesh, for Anike, and for hundreds of thousands like them, the future remains uncertain. Their lives unfold in the spaces between official records and everyday survival.
Until the UK can accurately measure the phenomenon, visa overstayers will remain both a political flashpoint and a hidden community—living under the radar, navigating fear, hope, and a system struggling to define them.
Related Article:
Statutory Declaration in the UK: What It Is & How to Make One Legally
Avoid Costly Mistakes: What You Need to Know About Statutory Declarations in the UK
